Robert Collins wrote:
> True, but if it's being modified regularly, I cannot write the changes
> to the squid-cache.org CVS server's HEAD - so kinkie & I need somewhere
> to write them that won't be overwritten. So whether it goes in or not,
> we will still need a branch around to work on it.
That is the general idea yes.
> > You might want to continue to maintain a Squid-2.4 version of
> > the patch
> > for early adopters.
>
> Can we tag it on sourceforge and use your diff script?
Well.. the current branch is already a little post-2.4.. so what is done
is that a ntlm-2_4 branch is created from s2_4, and the diff applied
there.
So in the end you will have two SourceForge branches for ntlm. One for
changes relative HEAD, one for the Squid-2.4 patch. It is your
responsibility to backport the relevant ntlm changes from HEAD to the
ntlm-2_4 branch.
Yes, the diff script will work fine for both.
/Henrik
Received on Fri Jan 05 2001 - 13:36:11 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:10 MST