Re: storeGet() -> storeGetPublic() ?

On Sun, Jan 07, 2001, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> > perhaps provide a set of routines that allow a fs to build a in memory index, then something like reiserFS could optionally pass all
> > additions/purges through those routines, thus generating a in memory index - and then digest capability. Yes for reiser it's
> > additional code with no purpose but creating digests, but on the other hand it'd be very modular and thus easy to #define on or off
> > for the cache administrator to choose...
>
> Naa.. that would invalidate the whole concept of how reiserfs_raw is
> designed (the FS keeps the index, not the application), and is
> non-trivial to implement there as Squid has no clue about deletetions
> (happens automagically in the kernel-FS when needed)

.. but then, it wouldn't be that hard to have something percolate back
up to squid to say "object X was destroyed", if it would help the
cache digest cause.

Adrian

-- 
Adrian Chadd			"Here's five for the cake, and
<adrian@creative.net.au>	  five to buy a clue."
				    - Ryan, Whatever it Takes