splay-userauth (was: RE: transfer-encoding)

From: Chemolli Francesco (USI) <ChemolliF@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 09:42:33 +0100

Sure. It works fine.

Robert and I are discussing some extensions to that, centering
about how to better implement an acl/http_access check that
will match against users credentials, WITHOUT requiring the users
to authenticate if there are no credentials.

Doing so is the first step to add two features:

- a no_log option, allowing squid not to log some requests.
(i.e. you might not want to log accesses from SOME users).
- an auth-system by which users are required to access a certain URL
to authenticate.

I believe these can wait until after we do the branch-shuffling in
preparation for 2.4 though.

-- 
	ing. Francesco Chemolli
	Unicredit Servizi Informativi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Chadd [mailto:adrian@creative.net.au]
> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 11:57 AM
> To: Henrik Nordstrom
> Cc: squid-dev@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: transfer-encoding
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > 
> > > Any known issues with the auth_rewrite framework?
> > 
> > You already said no, didn't you?
> > 
> > Okay every one: any objections against merging 
> auth_rewrite+ntlm? This
> > is the last call.
> 
> Nope.
> 
> Perhaps the next branch to be merged in should be the splay_userauth
> branch?
> 
> 
> Adrian
> 
> -- 
> Adrian Chadd			"Here's five for the cake, and
> <adrian@creative.net.au>	  five to buy a clue."
> 				    - Ryan, Whatever it Takes
> 
Received on Mon Jan 08 2001 - 01:42:24 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:13 MST