Think it was Duane who dropped a patch into HEAD about a month ago to
let messages from acl.c go back through
clientAcessCheckDone->errorAppendEntry and finally to the users 401 or
407 page. This was to allow feedback on the reason for the deny. I took
the core of that patch and utilised it. The message as implemented now
is request & auth scheme specific.
I think the original patch to HEAD used a struct entry char
*authmessage; if you want to look for it.
Rob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@hem.passagen.se]
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 January 2001 12:01 PM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: squid-dev@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: auth_info %m
>
>
> They felt pretty similar, but maybe I misunderstood what %m
> is.. haven't
> had time yet to look at it.
>
> /Henrik
>
>
> Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> > How so?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@hem.passagen.se]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, 9 January 2001 10:34 AM
> > > To: Robert Collins
> > > Cc: squid-dev@squid-cache.org
> > > Subject: Re: auth_info %m
> > >
> > >
> > > Robert Collins wrote:
> > >
> > > > This has allowed me to utilise the message (%m) feature in
> > > > the ERROR pages for cache access denied. Currently I just
> > > > inform the user of empty passwords or broken headers in the
> > > > basic scheme.
> > >
> > > Hmm.. correct me if I am wrong, but I guess this makes
> the authinfo
> > > patch pretty obsolete...
> > >
> > > /Henrik
> > >
> > >
>
>
Received on Mon Jan 08 2001 - 18:19:56 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:14 MST