And if this optimization bug is still in 2.95.3-test2, I am pretty sure
the release manager would like to know about it BEFORE 2.95.3 is
released.
/Henrik
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> However, I'd like to have this tested in a more official 2.95.3 release
> (i.e. 2.95.3-test2, released a few days ago) than the old snapshot
> release OpenBSD 2.8 apparently ships with before permanently adding
> 2.95.3 to the list of banned compilers. From reading the mail archives
> there seems to have been quite a bit of cleanups in gcc-2.95 the last
> months, preparing for the 2.95.3 release, and if adding to this that
> there is patched 2.95.2 versions around which does not exibit the
> problem I see it likely to be fixed in 2.95.3.
>
> /Henrik
Received on Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:26:07 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:25 MST