Re: dynamic modules

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:43:51 +0100

Robert Collins wrote:

> anyone think that dynamic modules are a good thing/bad thing?

I am in favor of it, with interfaces for at least

  * object store
  * removal policy
  * reply filters
  * request filters (extrapolation of redirectors)
  * ACL types

To allow for this, a few APIs of Squid should be formalized:

  * how to register for filedescriptor events
  * how to open files/sockets/pipes
  * how to sleep (time events).

I am also in favor for using dynamic linking in bringing these modules
in, but dynamic linking should be a optional feature, allowing for a
static binary to be built with all the required modules linked in from
start.

/Henrik
Received on Tue Jan 30 2001 - 15:01:17 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:26 MST