On Sat, Jun 30, 2001, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Seems to be a problem with refreshes when the object is already cached
> but expired.
>
> Not sure what to do about it. Not sure what to do about it, or if it is
> of general interest to Squid in normal use outside this specific
> benchmark.
>
>
> Fellow Squid developers: What is your opinion on how/if/when we should
> chain concurrent requests for the same object before even the status is
> known?
Why can't we just return an error in the same order as it'd appear
if the requests weren't pipelined?
Eg, if the browser requests A B, C and D and C errors out, return
A and B and then an error for C.
Note that I'm going to be re-reading the relevant HTTP RFCs this
weekend, so I might be missing something that I wouldn't miss
on Monday. :-)
Adrian
-- Adrian Chadd Yeah, for me its (XML) like the movie Titanic. <adrian@creative.net.au> Everybody loves it. I want to be different, so I hate it. --Duane WesselsReceived on Thu Jul 05 2001 - 16:04:10 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:05 MST