Re: Multiple request blocking

On Fri, Jul 06, 2001, Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote:
> > cachable (current
> > > model)
> > > c) Never
>
> We could just have later requests wait until enough is known
> (which maybe is what we're doing now). I agree with Andres
> that joining without knowledge is a Bad Thing(tm).
> Or, we could introduce something like CPU pipelining.
> We optimistically join, but as soon as we can determine whether
> the request can be shared (i.e. after getting HTTP headers from
> the origin) we add an extra check and if it can't share we
> un-join and start a new request.

..if you've started sending data to the second client.. :)

Adrian

-- 
Adrian Chadd			Yeah, for me its (XML) like the movie Titanic.
<adrian@creative.net.au>	  Everybody loves it.
				    I want to be different, so I hate it.
					--Duane Wessels