Re: HEAD make dist fails

On Wed, Mar 12, 2003, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> But why is it that we keep running into automake bugs all the time?
> The use of automake is supposed to cause less grief, not more..

Heh. Bleeding edge features..

btw, check this out:

(gdb) run -ND
Starting program: /home/adrian/work/squid/squid-cvs/squid3/src/squid -ND

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x281efb58 in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4
(gdb) bt
#0 0x281efb58 in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4
#1 0x2823110a in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4
#2 0x808579b in xassert (msg=0x8109f6a "fd == httpState->fd", file=0x8109cc7 "http.cc", line=823)
    at debug.cc:352
#3 0x809efd3 in httpReadReply (fd=1550,
    buf=0xc1b70ec "HTTP/1.0 200 OK\r\nCache-Control: private,no-cache\r\nPragma: no-cache\r\nDate: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:15:55 GMT\r\nConnection: keep-alive\r\nExpires: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:15:36 GMT\r\nX-Xact: 080d92e5.2e5142af:7fef7"..., len=1676, flag=COMM_OK, xerrno=0, data=0xc1b70b0) at http.cc:823
#4 0x807e78e in CommReadCallbackData::callCallback (this=0x8aae170) at comm.cc:510
#5 0x807e8c5 in CommCallbackData::callACallback (this=0x8aae170) at comm.cc:542
#6 0x807e918 in comm_calliocallback () at comm.cc:570
#7 0x80b4e0b in main (argc=2, argv=0xbfbff780) at main.cc:943
#8 0x804a96a in _start ()
(gdb) frame 3
#3 0x809efd3 in httpReadReply (fd=1550,
    buf=0xc1b70ec "HTTP/1.0 200 OK\r\nCache-Control: private,no-cache\r\nPragma: no-cache\r\nDate: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:15:55 GMT\r\nConnection: keep-alive\r\nExpires: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:15:36 GMT\r\nX-Xact: 080d92e5.2e5142af:7fef7"..., len=1676, flag=COMM_OK, xerrno=0, data=0xc1b70b0) at http.cc:823
823 assert (fd == httpState->fd);
(gdb) print fd
$1 = 1550
(gdb) print httpState->fd
$2 = 1680881712
(gdb) print *httpState
$3 = {entry = 0x65322e35, request = 0x32343135,
  reply_hdr = 0x373a6661 <Error reading address 0x373a6661: Bad address>, reply_hdr_size = 929457510,
  reply_hdr_state = 224683108, _peer = 0x532d580a, eof = 1462597234, orig_request = 0x203a6469,
  fd = 1680881712, flags = {proxying = 0, keepalive = 1, only_if_cached = 0, headers_pushed = 0,
    front_end_https = 2, originpeer = 1}, fwd = 0x3331362e, currentOffset = 3472339330015638626,
  do_next_read = 808464432, read_sz = 168636976,
  buf = "HTTP/1.0 200 OK\r\nCache-Control: private,no-cache\r\nPragma: no-cache\r\nDate: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:15:55 GMT\r\nConnection: keep-alive\r\nExpires: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:15:36 GMT\r\nX-Xact: 080d92e5.2e5142af:7fef7"..., ignoreCacheControl = false, surrogateNoStore = false}
(gdb)

Thats with me 'stressing' out a ufs cache at 75 req/sec and then, once discovering
we were lagging being (6500 open fds) I SIGKILL'ed the polygraph processes.
Bewm.

Adrian
Received on Wed Mar 12 2003 - 01:23:06 MST