Re: Merge some other enh bugs in 2.6 ?

From: Guido Serassio <guido.serassio@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:27:25 +0200

Hi Henrik,

At 23.52 15/06/2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

>tor 2006-06-15 klockan 21:44 +0200 skrev Guido Serassio:
>
> > What about merge the following enh bugs into 2.6 ?
>
>It is a bit late now, but lets talk about them.
>
> > - #1235: New options to ignore Cache-Control headers when necessary
>
>Don't like this one. If done it should be refresh_pattern options, not
>global settings. And additionally these overrides should not be taken
>lightly (it's MUST level violations of the RFC..)
>
>If redone into refresh_pattern options then it can perhaps get in if we
>agree it's a good thing. But it depends also on how much other changes
>is needed to allow refresh_pattern to apply.. and time.. when the known
>bugs are closed RC1 is released and code enters strict feature freeze.
>
> > - #1423: Could use TCP_CORK to optimize cache hits
>
>Have considered this one, but I don't think it is very important. With
>the very limited time left and number of open bugs (at least 2) I prefer
>not looking at new features touching core parts of the source,
>especially when the gains is very small like in this case.

Ok, really no problem.

I have asked this just to be sure that they was not forgotten.

Regards

Guido

-
========================================================
Guido Serassio
Acme Consulting S.r.l. - Microsoft Certified Partner
Via Lucia Savarino, 1 10098 - Rivoli (TO) - ITALY
Tel. : +39.011.9530135 Fax. : +39.011.9781115
Email: guido.serassio@acmeconsulting.it
WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
Received on Fri Jun 16 2006 - 00:27:30 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Jun 30 2006 - 12:00:02 MDT