Re: Time for squid 3.0 STABLE2 ?

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:13:18 +1300

Robert Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:41 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>
>>>>> * Close more bugs?
>>> Booger:
>>>
>>> stub time| COSS block-size = 512 bytes
>>> stub time| COSS largest file offset = -1 KB
>>> stub time| COSS cache_dir size = 102400 KB
>>> stub time| Fatal: COSS cache_dir size exceeds largest offset
>>> .FAIL: tests/testCoss
>> I'd suggest just disabling COSS in -3 until someone ports over the changes
>> or replaces it with something better.
>>
>> It really is actually very broken for even light production use.
>
> A very useful thing would be to file a bug on -3 that lists the
> changesets from 2 that need to be ported.
>
> -Rob

Hm, yes. Henrik, is there a report somewhere that lgroups the merged
changesets the same way the maintainer merge.html lists the un-merged
and non-merged ones?

Amos

-- 
Please use Squid 2.6STABLE17+ or 3.0STABLE1+
There are serious security advisories out on all earlier releases.
Received on Thu Feb 28 2008 - 05:12:48 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 12:00:09 MST