Re: [squid-users] mem use and cache settings seems to be broke on 12

On Tuesday 01 November 2005 08:40, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
> The proxy-only explains why there is no caching... (proxy-only simply says
> "Do not cache objects fetched from this peer")
>

I know but this is regarding objects which would be served by the cache_peer
but not for ALL request, right?
May be I am wrong but "objects fetched from from this cache should not be
saved locally" is what I really want but does not mean that NO objects should
not be saved locally any more.

>
> The exact details regarding why a lot more is now sent via the peer is
> another question, but when neither never_direct or always_direct is
> "allow" for the request Squid should prefer to send most requests via the
> peer if possible so it's actually more of a question why this was not done
> in the earlier version..
>

ok, but when I was monitoring I still had hundreds of connections dierctly to
remote servers not fetching from the parent. At least this objects should be
saved in cache_dir or on memory or not?

also I am suprised by that no-proxy then is not only affecting cache_dir but
also objects cached in RAM, right? If so probably a addicional explanation in
squid.conf.sample would do good because saved locally IMO is common sense for
saving to disk but not meant to mean hold in RAM also

H.

A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Received on Tue Nov 01 2005 - 05:06:29 MST