Joe Ramey writes:
>I just upgraded from squid 1.1.21 to squid 1.1.22. Should I have
>removed my cache before doing this upgrade? I did not remove it, I
>let 1.1.22 use the existing cache, and it caused some warnings I
>hadn't seen before. First of all, I had several entries like this in
>the cache.log at startup time:
>
>1998/06/25 15:09:25| WARNING: newer swaplog entry for fileno 00001748
>1998/06/25 15:09:25| WARNING: newer swaplog entry for fileno 00009F2F
>1998/06/25 15:09:25| WARNING: newer swaplog entry for fileno 00001BE4
>1998/06/25 15:09:25| WARNING: newer swaplog entry for fileno 00009D96
>1998/06/25 15:09:25| WARNING: newer swaplog entry for fileno 0000458B
>1998/06/25 15:09:25| WARNING: newer swaplog entry for fileno 0000D9DC
>1998/06/25 15:09:25| WARNING: newer swaplog entry for fileno 00008E34
>1998/06/25 15:09:25| WARNING: newer swaplog entry for fileno 00000468
>1998/06/25 15:09:25| WARNING: newer swaplog entry for fileno 0000BA89
>1998/06/25 15:09:25| WARNING: newer swaplog entry for fileno 0000B81E
>
>etc.
>
>Then, once squid had finished initializing the cache, occasionally I
>saw warnings like this:
>
>1998/06/25 15:11:35| storeSwapInHandle: WARNING: Object size mismatch.
>1998/06/25 15:11:35| --> 'http://www.stockmaster.com/sm/g/T/TXN.html'
>1998/06/25 15:11:35| --> Expecting 10140 bytes from file: /cache/0A/ED/00008
EDA
>1998/06/25 15:11:35| --> Only read 650 bytes
The cache formats did not change for this version. I can't explain
this behaviour. I assume your 1.1.21 cache got shut down
cleanly? I hope this is an isolated incident....
Duane W.
Received on Fri Jun 26 1998 - 09:37:28 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:40:52 MST